West News Wire: A US judge has rejected Mexico’s $10 billion lawsuit, which attempted to hold US gun makers accountable for aiding the influx of guns being transported to drug gangs across the US-Mexico border.

Mexico claimed in its August 2021 complaint that up to 597,000 firearms made by the defendants cited in the lawsuit 2.2% of the almost 40 million guns produced in the United States each year are trafficked into Mexico.

Mexico said that at least 17,000 homicides in 2019 alone were associated with the trafficking of weapons from the US.

The court is required to uphold the law even though it has a great deal of sympathy for Mexican citizens and none whatsoever for those who sell weapons into Mexican criminal organizations. Chief Judge F Dennis Saylor said in a 44-page decision announced in federal court in Boston on Friday.

Saylor said federal law “unequivocally” bars lawsuits seeking to hold gun manufacturers responsible when people use guns for their intended purpose. He said the law contained several narrow exceptions, but none applied.

The decision is a victory for gun makers Smith & Wesson Brands, Sturm, Ruger & Co, Barrett Firearms Manufacturing Inc, Colt’s Manufacturing Company LLC, Glock Inc, and others who were accused of undermining Mexico’s strict gun laws by designing, marketing and selling military-style assault weapons that drug cartels use.

Mexico’s foreign affairs ministry said it would appeal the decision “and continue insisting that the sale of guns be responsible, transparent and accountable, and that the negligent way in which they are sold in the United States facilitates criminals’ access to them”.

“This suit by the Mexican government has received worldwide recognition and has been considered a turning point in the discussion around the gun industry’s responsibility for the violence experience in Mexico and the region,” the ministry said.

Read More
Biden, Trump to make final pitches day before vital US midterm elections

Mexico was seeking at least $10bn in compensation, but legal experts had viewed the lawsuit as a long shot.

The Mexican government had argued that the companies know their practices contribute to the trafficking of guns into Mexico and facilitate it. Mexico wanted compensation for the havoc the guns have wrought on its people.

A lawyer for Smith & Wesson declined to comment. Lawyers for Sturm, Ruger did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Mexico said gun smuggling has been a key factor in its ranking third worldwide in the number of gun-related deaths each year. It also claimed to suffer many other harms, including declining investment and economic activity and a need to spend more on law enforcement and public safety.

But the judge said Mexico could not overcome a provision in a US law the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that shields gun makers from lawsuits over “the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended”.

Mexico argued the US protection act did not apply when an injury occurred outside the United States.

“Mexico is seeking to hold defendants liable for practices that occurred within the United States and only resulted in harm in Mexico,” he wrote. “This case thus represents a valid domestic application of the PLCAA, and the presumption against extraterritoriality does not apply.”

The sale of firearms is severely restricted in Mexico and controlled by the defence department. But thousands of guns are smuggled into Mexico each year by the country’s powerful drug cartels.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here